The purpose of the floating balance was to lower the cost of production. If you compare the cost of an Elliott to a Smiths of somewhat similar appearance, the Elliott clock may have cost up to ten times as much as the Smiths clock. To mass-produce a clock of similar accuracy for one tenth the cost was quite an accomplishment.
The German manufacturer Hermle also produced clocks with floating balances in subsequent decades, bringing the cost of production down further and improving the product. However, mass production has its drawbacks, and some Hermle clocks are more accurate than others. Below is a Hermle clock from 1999 with a floating balance from 1977 (because I prefer the older balance wheels). This particular Hermle is one of the most accurate mechanical clocks I have seen in the last 35 years at the bench, so I added it to my collection.
|
In the 1950s and 60s, Smiths was the largest manufacturer of watches and clocks in Europe. By the 1980s, Smiths was out of business and Hermle had taken over as the largest manufacturer. I remember that in 1995, Hermle produced 800,000 movements of one type, the 340-020 floating balance clock above, plus a dozen other clock movement types.
The are several advantages with floating balance clocks. They are self-starting (or they should be). They do not have to be perfectly level, which makes them much more user friendly than pendulum clocks. Also, if you wind them twice a week, they are considerably more accurate than the average pendulum clock.
There are a few disadvantages too. The main problem is that watchmakers do not work on clocks, and very few clockmakers have any watchmaking skills, so they blame the clocks. When I got my Smiths clocks, I noticed that they had no visible wear. Each clock had probably stopped because the owner forgot to wind it. When he wound it, it did not self-start, so the owner thought something was wrong with it and put it in storage. Each clock was slightly out of beat.
When you examine the escapement, you can see that the distance from the entry pallet pin to the top of the fork is almost twice as much as the distance from the exit pallet pin to the top of the pallet fork. This means that the action of the escapement is asymmetrical, and so is the ticking sound. Listening to the escapement with a beat amplifier, the sound needs to be symmetrical with the balance wheel moving at minimum swing. Adjust the upper hairspring stud slightly, until the beat is symmetrical. When the balance has a wider swing, the sound will be asymmetrical because the action is asymmetrical. Remember that you must use a beat amplifier and adjust for minimum swing. Every Smiths floating balance clock should be checked for this.
The floating balance escapements in more modern Hermle clocks is also asymmetrical, but only slightly, and you may not notice a difference. Hermle floating balance clocks are rarely out of beat.
All clocks with balance wheels are supposed to be self-starting, but the design is not infallible. If you have one that does not self-start, you can always start the clock by pushing on the balance wheel a little with a toothpick. Using your fingers is too aggressive, so I recommend using a toothpick.
Every collector should have an Elliott clock, a Smiths floating balance clock, and a Hermle floating balance clock in his collection. I particularly like the Smiths K7A floating balance clock because all the escapement parts are fully visible and the plates are decorated with damaskeening, resulting in a feast for the eyes and a clock which is fascinating to look at in action. A clock does not have to be expensive for it to be fun.
Instructions for Smiths K7A Floating Balance Clock
Instructions for Smiths K6A Pendulum Clock
ADDENDUM:
If we go back to the alarm mechanism, and rotate the pallet arbor by 90° with the hammer hanging down, swinging from side to side, behold the pendulum. How simple is that? It would look something like this:
I found this image on the internet.
Go to the Strike Rack Mechanism
Clock Repair Main Page
Escapements in Motion
Links Page